About Power & PolicyPower & Policy is a virtual forum for explaining and debating the exercise of American power in the world. The core participants are renowned Harvard Kennedy School faculty members and associates who have spent decades studying how power works.
Topics9/11 Afghanistan Al Qaeda American power Arab spring Belfer Center Bush China cyber Egypt Europe Fukushima Graham Allison Harvard Harvard Kennedy School Heineman Heinonen Iran Iraq Islam Israel Japan Libya Middle East military Muammar al-Gaddafi Mubarak Muslim Brotherhood NATO Nicholas Burns North Korea nuclear Nye Obama Osama bin Laden power Putin Qaddafi Russia Saudi Arabia security Syria terrorism Wikileaks Yemen
Tag Archives: Nye
President Obama’s speech on Afghanistan has been described as a domestic political compromise between those who want a rapid drawdown and those who want more time. Foreign policy always rests on domestic compromises in a democracy, and the initial reaction … Continue reading
When I was asked recently by a British literary website to recommend five books about global power, I naturally started with my favorite – Thucydides’ History of the Peloponnesian War. But I also included a recent book by Richard A. Clarke and Robert K. Knake, Cyber War, because it is a useful primer on an increasingly important dimension of power.
(Dick Clarke is a faculty affiliate in the Harvard Kennedy School’s Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs — and is a contributor to Power & Policy; his initial blog post on cyber security is a stark survey of cyber concerns).
While techies have been aware of cyber problems for some time, political leaders and strategists are just beginning to come to terms with cyber power. In February, for the first time in its 47 years, the Munich Security Conference included a session on cyber security: it was a major issue at the April meeting of the Trilateral Commission in Washington; and the EastWest Institute held its second worldwide cybersecurity summit of more than 400 people from 40 countries in London in early June. Now the British government is planning a major intergovernmental conference in November.
My friend John Deutch has challenged me to explain the breakdown of governance in the United States and to identify what can be done about our capacity to deal with it.
The problems are real, but “breakdown” is too strong a word to describe them, and it is important to put current problems in historical perspective. The founders deliberately designed American government to be inefficient with checks, balances, and delays. As the joke goes, it was designed so King George could not rule over us — nor anyone else. Some argue that an inefficient 18th century design cannot cope with 21st century global problems like the rise of Asia or the transnational diffusion that I describe in The Future of Power. However, our inefficient system has coped with even greater problems in the past with only one serious breakdown a century and a half ago.
John Deutch, the former U.S. director of central intelligence and deputy secretary of defense and who is now an institute professor at MIT, has challenged his friend Joseph Nye to complete an unusual “assignment.” Deutch called on Nye to use the analytical lens that Nye has long focused on international problems to tackle a domestic crisis – what Deutch describes as the breakdown of governance in the United States. Deutch gave Nye this assignment at a gathering of colleagues on May 17 at the Harvard Kennedy School to honor Nye’s decades of academic and public service. Nye, a former assistant secretary of defense for international security affairs, is a Harvard University distinguished service professor and former dean of the Harvard Kennedy School. Deutch is a board member of the Kennedy School’s Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs.
The Nye assignment forms the basis of a new installment of The Power Problem, an occasional feature on the Power & Policy blog that allows experts to propose answers to pressing policy problems. Joe Nye will respond soon to Deutch’s challenge by publishing his completed homework assignment on this blog – and virtual comments on Joe’s proposed repairs will be welcome, from participants at the gathering and from others who care about the problem. The goal is to foster a serious debate that generates specific suggestions.
Deutch’s full remarks:
In my last posting, I agreed with my colleagues that Libya did not involve vital interests, but I said that it did involve humanitarian interests and they can be important. In general, I agree with my friends that humanitarian intervention … Continue reading
In view of the criticism by Martin Peretz of The New Republic and in Mother Jones magazine of my meeting in 2007 with Muammar Qaddafi and my subsequent article in The New Republic, let me try to clarify what actually … Continue reading
As authoritarian Arab regimes struggle with Twitter and Al Jazeera inflamed-demonstrations; Iran tries to cope with the cyber sabotage of its nuclear enrichment program; and American diplomats try to understand the impact of Wikileaks, it is clear that smart policy in an information age will need a more sophisticated understanding of power in world politics.
That is the argument of my new book The Future of Power. Two types of power shifts are occurring in this century – power transition and power diffusion. Power transition from one dominant state to another is a familiar historical event, but power diffusion is a more novel process. The problem for all states in today’s global information age is that more things are happening outside the control of even the most powerful states. In the words of Richard Haass, president of the Council on Foreign Relations (and once a faculty member at the Kennedy School), “the proliferation of information is as much a cause of nonpolarity as is the proliferation of weaponry.”